NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: EJU v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 270 Hearing dates: 22 July 2020 Date of orders: 2 November 2020 Decision date: 02 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision to revoke EJU's Category H firearms licence is set aside. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Firearms – Revocation of firearm licence – Whether it is contrary to the public interest for applicant to hold a licence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Ors (1995) 131 ALR 657 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16. Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRp 6; (1991) 1 VR 63 Ward v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2004] NSWADT 110 Category: Principal judgment Parties: EJU (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: EJU (Applicant) Office of the General Counsel, NSW Police Force (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00120602 Publication restriction: Section 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies in relation to the identity of the Applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate