NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jaken Properties Australia Pty Limited v Naaman [2020] NSWSC 1554 Hearing dates: 2 November 2020 Date of orders: 3 November 2020 Decision date: 03 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rees J Decision: Interlocutory injunctions against cross defendants; Mareva orders against third parties. Catchwords: MAREVA INJUNCTION – suggested breach of 2014 freezing order – parties said to hold $3.6M on trust as consequence – 2016 judgment unpaid – suggested efforts over many years to frustrate judgment – third proceedings listed for hearing – suggested further dissipation of $14M to third parties – multiple changes to trust – not necessary to join third parties to get Mareva – principles at [39]-[48] – serious question to be tried – balance of convenience – trial imminent – Mareva of short duration – no evidence of prejudice. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (2019) 368 ALR 390; [2019] HCA 20 Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd [1993] AC 334 Deputy Cmr of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad (No 3) [2012] FCA 594 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Chemical Trustee Ltd (No 4) (2012) 90 ATR 711; [2012] FCA 1064 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2016] WASCA 105 Naaman v Sleiman [2014] NSWSC 1869 Naaman v Sleiman [2015] NSWCA 259 Ninemia Maritime Corp v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG [1984] 1 All ER 398 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Warner-Lambert Co LCC v Apotex Pty Ltd (2014) 311 ALR 632; [2014] FCAFC 59 Texts Cited: Peter Biscoe QC, Mareva and Anton Piller Orders (2005, LexisNexis Butterworths Australia) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jaken Properties Australia Pty Limited (Plaintiff/First cross-defendant) Anthony Naaman (Defendant/Cross-claimant) Peter Sleiman (Second cross-defendant) Tony Sleiman (Third cross-defendant) Superior Family Investments Pty Ltd (Fourth cross-defendant) O'Malley's Hotel Pty Ltd (Fifth cross-defendant) PSJK Holdings Pty Ltd (Sixth cross-defendant) Powerhouse Corporation Pty Ltd (Seventh cross-defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate