NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 31) [2020] NSWSC 1556 Hearing dates: 28 October 2020 Date of orders: 28 October 2020 Decision date: 28 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The application to limit the use of Leonard Rivers' evidence of a conversation with Ying Cheng Luo on 11 or 12 January 2017 pursuant to s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) is granted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – hearsay evidence - application to limit use of evidence - admissions by one accused to witness - contract to kill - acceptance of contract - intention to carry out contract - not admissible as an admission against co-accused - in one respect admissible as evidence of contemporaneous representation of speaker's intention - admissible as circumstantial evidence of subsequent agreement and joint criminal enterprise - appropriate to make an order limiting use of evidence against co-accused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 87(1)(c), 66A, 136 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li) Publication restriction: No publication until conclusion of trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate