NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CR v R [2020] NSWCCA 289 Hearing dates: 21 October 2020 Decision date: 23 November 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court of NSW. (4) In lieu thereof, sentence the applicant to imprisonment for 6 years and 3 months commencing on 9 March 2017 and expiring on 8 June 2023. (5) Specify a non-parole period of 4 years and 1 month imprisonment commencing on 9 March 2017 and expiring on 8 April 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Where applicant pleaded guilty to one count of producing child abuse material, two counts of using a child under 14 years of age to produce child abuse material and one count of possessing child abuse material – Where sentencing judge erred in applying a non-existent standard non-parole period to two of the offences – Error established – Necessity to re-sentence the applicant in the fresh exercise of the sentencing discretion – Consideration of factors relevant to sentence for this kind of offending – General deterrence and denunciation of paramount importance – Where the applicant pleaded guilty at the first available opportunity – Where the material was produced or possessed for the applicant's own use – Where the applicant was not acting in a collaborative network of like-minded individuals – Where the offending was unsophisticated – Where the applicant's use of children was limited to superimposing photos of the faces of two children onto images and videos – Where the offending involved a serious breach of trust – Where prospects of rehabilitation were guarded – Where there were special circumstances justifying adjustment of statutory ratio – Applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Child Sex Offences) Act 2015 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Carter v R [2018] NSWCCA 138 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DPP (Cth) v D'Alessandro (2010) 26 VR 477; [2010] VSCA 60 DPP (Cth) v Guest [2014] VSCA 29 Maxwell v R [2020] NSWCCA 94 Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v CR [2019] NSWDC 884 R v De Leeuw [2015] NSWCCA 183 R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 R v Gent (2005) 162 A Crim R 29; [2005] NSWCCA 370 R v Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA 152 R v Jones (1990) 108 A Crim R 50; [1999] WASCA 24 R v Jongsma (2004) 150 A Crim R 386; [2004] VSCA 218 R v Porte (2015) 252 A Crim R 294; [2015] NSWCCA 174 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 Weber v R [2020] NSWCCA 103 Yeung v R [2018] NSWCCA 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CR – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan – Applicant G Newton – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate