NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Collier [2020] NSWSC 1572 Hearing dates: 19 December 2019 Decision date: 09 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) The plaintiff is granted leave to access the following court files: (a) Collier v State of New South Wales (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2014/290461); (b) Collier v Cook (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2012/88605); (c) Collier v NSW Police Service (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2012/201151); (d) Collier v Lancer (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2012/27475); (e) Collier v Country Women's Association of New South Wales (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2017/72463); (f) Collier v Country Women's Association of New South Wales (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2016/122571); (g) Collier v Country Women's Association of New South Wales (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2016/297965); and (h) Collier v Country Women's Association of New South Wales (NSW Supreme Court case no. 2017/360202). (2) The plaintiff is granted leave to access the court file of Collier v Chief Executive Officer and Director-General of the Department of Child Safety Queensland (NSW Supreme Court case no. 1580/09), except for any affidavits or transcript of evidence of Mr Robert John Collier or communications from him. (3) No order as to costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Production of documents – application seeking access to documents in the custody of the court – r 33.13 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – where documents are for the purpose of applying for an order under s 8(7) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – whether documents should be produced where they may disclose material objected to by a respondent Legislation Cited: Court Information Act 2010 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 33.13 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 6, 8 Cases Cited: Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Rich (2001) 51 NSWLR 643; [2001] NSWSC 496 Kostov v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 1794 Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales (2015) 89 NSWLR 284; [2015] NSWCA 129 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 UTSG Pty Ltd v Gwynvill Properties Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 558 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Gen 2 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Marion Louise Collier (Defendant) Robert John Collier (Respondent) Chief Executive Officer and Director-General of the Department of Child Safety (Respondent) Damien Carter (Respondent) State of New South Wales (Respondent) Country Women's Association of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Birch (Plaintiff) Defendant (In Person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate