NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lembke [2020] NSWCCA 293 Hearing dates: 12 October 2020 Date of orders: 13 November 2020 Decision date: 13 November 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1] Garling J at [2] Wright J at [68] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — By Crown against inadequacy – where the offender was involved in a significant importation of a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug (cocaine) - whether the sentence imposed on the offender was manifestly inadequate by reference to sentences imposed on co-offenders by a different sentencing judge – the role of the principle of parity in a Crown appeal – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code (Cth) 1995 Cases Cited: Baquiran v R [2014] NSWCCA 221 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Ith v R [2013] NSWCCA 280 Ng v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 227; (2011) 214 A Crim R 191 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Bath; R v Jackson [2019] NSWDC 1 R v Chandler; Chandler v R [2012] NSWCCA 135 R v Doff [2005] NSWCCA 119 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; (2010) 205 A Crim R 106 R v Sara [2020] NSWCCA 119 R v Weismantel [2016] NSWCCA 204 Regina v Gu [2006] NSWCCA 104 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig William Lembke (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: J Single SC / R Ranken (Appellant) K H Averre (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate