NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eakin v R [2020] NSWCCA 294 Hearing dates: 17 August 2020 Date of orders: 11 November 2020 Decision date: 11 November 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Rothman J at [40]; Price J at [73] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) The sentence imposed by McClintock SC DCJ on 2 August 2019 is quashed. (4) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months commencing on 8 July 2019 and expiring on 7 January 2023 with a non-parole period of 2 years expiring on 7 July 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – Senior Australian Border Force officer – aiding and abetting the importation of tobacco products with the intention of defrauding the revenue – acceptance of a bribe – co-offender's sentence reduced on appeal – whether erroneous sentence of co-offender overturned on appeal can give rise to justifiable sense of grievance – parity – proportionality – whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance – re-sentence – whether reduction in non-parole period would produce a manifestly inadequate sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A Criminal Code (Cth), ss 11.1(2), 141.1(1), 141.1(3), 400.4(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 233BABAD(1) Cases Cited: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 Chaloner v R [2018] NSWCCA 59 Chen v R; He v R [2018] NSWCCA 95 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Said Kohdor El Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49; 86 ALJR 36; 283 ALR 1; 214 A Crim R 152 Hamieh v R [2007] NSWCCA 277 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37; 88 ALJR 947; 313 ALR 451; 238 A Crim R 134 Lin v R [2018] NSWCCA 13 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Merhi v R [2019] NSWCCA 322 Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26; 71 ALJR 875; 145 ALR 408; 94 A Crim R 397 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370; 162 A Crim R 29 R v Ilbay [2000] NSWCCA 251 R v Kollas and Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 491 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 Rees v R [2012] NSWCCA 47 Tarrant v R [2018] NSWCCA 21 Texts Cited: A. V. Dicey, "Introduction to the Law of the Constitution", 8th Ed. (1915) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Richard Eakin (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Talbert (Applicant) Ms S Callan SC / Ms R McEwen (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate