NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2020] NSWLEC 153 Hearing dates: 6 October 2020 Date of orders: 11 November 2020 Decision date: 11 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Pain J Decision: See [122] of judgment Catchwords: PROSECUTION – sentencing – pollution of waters – plea of guilty – flushing of sewage effluent in national park – sewage overflow not subject of charge –assessment of environmental harm does not include sewage overflow – failure to implement recommendations for manual clean-up before flushing – practical measures to avoid harm not taken – high range of low objective seriousness – prior convictions an aggravating factor – discount for early guilty plea – likelihood of re-offending low – defendant of good corporate character – remorse demonstrated PROSECUTION – sentencing – breach of condition of environment protection licence – plea of guilty –failure to take all reasonable and feasible actions as soon as practicable to minimise impact of sewage overflow not subject of charge – failure to properly clean up sewage over three week period – no aggravating state of mind due to application of De Simoni principle – high range of low objective seriousness – discount for early guilty plea – likelihood of re-offending low – defendant of good corporate character – remorse demonstrated Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 21A, 22 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 257B, 257G Fines Act 1996 (NSW) s 122 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) s 30E Protection of Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) ss 3, 64, 116, 120, 123, 241, Pt 8.3 (ss 248, 250), s 253A Cases Cited: Andrews v DPP [1937] AC 576 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Limited (2006) 145 LGERA 234; [2006] NSWLEC 34 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Kyluk Pty Limited (No 4) (2014) 212 LGERA 1; [2014] NSWLEC 74 Cittadini v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 302 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Director-General, Department of Environment and Climate Change v Rae (2009) 168 LGERA 121; [2009] NSWLEC 137 Einfeld v R (2010) 200 A Crim R 1; [2010] NSWCCA 87 Environment Protection Authority v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd (2008) 163 LGERA 71; [2008] NSWLEC 280 Environment Protection Authority v Ecolab (2002) 123 LGERA 269; [2002] NSWLEC 206 Environment Protection Authority v Hawkesbury City Council [2017] NSWLEC 39 Environment Protection Authority v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 206 LGERA 239; [2014] NSWLEC 103 Environment Protection Authority v Queanbeyan City Council (No 3) (2012) 192 LGERA 415; [2012] NSWLEC 220 Environment Protection Authority v Snowy Hydro Ltd (2008) 162 LGERA 273; [2008] NSWLEC 264 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water [2019] NSWLEC 100 Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2015] NSWLEC 80 Environment Protection Authority v Tea Garden Farms Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 89 Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation (2006) 148 LGERA 299; [2006] NSWLEC 419 Environment Protection Authority v Wattke; Environment Protection Authority v Geerdink [2010] NSWLEC 24 Environment Protection Authority v Wollondilly Abattoirs Pty Ltd [2019] NSWLEC 72 Garrett v Freeman (No 5) (2009) 164 LGERA 287; [2009] NSWLEC 1 Garrett v Williams (2006) 160 LGERA 115; [2006] NSWLEC 785 Gordon Plath of the Department of Environment and Climate Change v Fish; Gordon Plath of the Department of Environment and Climate Change v Orogen Pty Ltd (2010) 179 LGERA 386; [2010] NSWLEC 144 Gregg v The Queen [2020] NSWCCA 245 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Hoare v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 348; [1989] HCA 33 King v The Queen (2012) 245 CLR 588; [2012] HCA 24 La Fontaine v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 62; [1976] HCA 52 Nydam v R [1977] VR 430 Pemble v R (1971) 124 CLR 107; [1971] HCA 20 Plath v Vaccount Pty Ltd t/as Tableland Timbers [2011] NSWLEC 202 R v Bateman [1925] All ER Rep 45; (1925) 19 Cr App R 8 R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464; [1985] HCA 22 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Moore (2015) 91 NSWLR 276; [2015] NSWCCA 316 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Peel [1971] 1 NSWLR 247 R v Taktak (1988) 14 NSWLR 226 R v Thompson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Visconti [1982] 2 NSWLR 104 Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Energy Limited; Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Upstream Infrastructure Investments Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 2 Veen v The Queen (1979) 143 CLR 458; [1979] HCA 7 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Sydney Water Corporation (Defendant) Representation: COUNSEL: G Wright (Prosecutor) I Hemmings SC and S Hall (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate