NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bahcekapili v R [2020] NSWCCA 296 Hearing dates: 21 September 2020 Date of orders: 13 November 2020 Decision date: 13 November 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [2] N Adams J at [10] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – robbery in company – parity with sentence of co-offender – subjective circumstances – whether applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance – relevance of co-offenders brain injury – co-offender sentenced for multiple offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 97(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1) Cases Cited: Ayik v R [2013] NSWCCA 119 El-Helou v R [2014] NSWCCA 209 Kelly v R [2017] NSWCCA 256 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Batuhan Bahcekapili (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Healey (Appellant) K Jeffreys (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00286948 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Date of Decision: 23 August 2019 Before: Herbert DCJ File Number(s): 2017/00013295; 2017/00013747; 2017/00286948; 2018/00015960
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate