NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Furnish & Finish Pty Ltd v Hollands [2020] NSWSC 1593 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 11 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: 1. The proceedings be dismissed with no order as to costs. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — whether an order for costs should be made in relation to discontinued or dismissed proceedings where no hearing on merits Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.19, 42.20 Cases Cited: Australiawide Airlines Ltd v Aspirion Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 365 Chen v Fang [2019] NSWSC 960 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2004) 60 NSWLR 425; [2004] NSWSC 381 Fordyce v Fordham (2006) 67 NSWLR 497; [2006] NSWCA 274 Freelancer International Pty Ltd v Matthew O'Kane [2019] NSWSC 159 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 681; [2018] NSWCA 84 Re the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Renton v Kelly [2018] NSWSC 1377 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW [42.19.5] Category: Costs Parties: Furnish & Finish Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Luci Hollands (First Defendant) Cordony Designs Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M A Karam (Plaintiff) D S Weinberger (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate