NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cotter v R [2020] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 6 November 2020 Decision date: 23 November 2020 Before: Payne JA at [1] Bellew J at [2] Wright J at [58] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Aggregate sentence imposed in the District Court of NSW quashed. (4) In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years commencing on 25 April 2019 and concluding on 24 April 2024. (5) I specify a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months' imprisonment commencing on 25 April 2019 and expiring on 24 July 2022. (6) I confirm the periods of disqualification from driving which were imposed in the District Court of New South Wales. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Appeal – Using an offensive weapon (a motor vehicle) with intent to prevent lawful apprehension – Driving a conveyance taken without the consent of the owner – Driving whilst disqualified – Driving with the presence of an illicit drug in his oral fluid – Finding by the sentencing judge that the principal offending of using an offensive weapon with intent to avoid lawful apprehension was spontaneous – Where sentencing judge concluded that this was not a mitigating factor –Error established – Necessity to re-sentence the applicant in the fresh exercise of the sentencing discretion – General deterrence of particular significance – Where prospects of rehabilitation largely dependent on drug rehabilitation – Special circumstances justifying adjustment of statutory ratio – Applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 R v Hamilton (1993) 66 A Crim R 575 R v Qutami (2001) A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 Saddler v R (2009) 194 A Crim R 452; [2009] NSWCCA 83 Weber v R [2020] NSWCCA 103 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ben Cotter – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez – Applicant M Kumar – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate