NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Black v Hunter New England Local Health District (No 3) [2020] NSWCATAD 280 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 November 2020 Decision date: 16 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R L Hamilton S C Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the Agency is AFFIRMED. (2) The name of Dr [name suppressed] is prohibited from disclosure pursuant to sec 64(1)(a) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – refusal by agency to deal with application – sec 60(1)(b) GIPA Act- same information previously requested and refused- no reasonable belief that a different decision would be made Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Black v Hunter New England Local Health District & [Anor] (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 235 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Black (Applicant) Hunter New England Local Health District (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Everingham Solomons (Applicant) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Intervenor) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00133958 Publication restriction: The name of Dr [name suppressed] is prohibited from disclosure pursuant to sec 64(1)(a) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate