NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney-General of NSW v George [2020] NSWSC 1621 Hearing dates: 09 November 2020 Date of orders: 18 November 2020 Decision date: 18 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) The Further Amended Summons dated 9 November 2020 is dismissed. (2) The order of the Court of 28 October 2020 staying the effect of the decision of the State Parole Authority dated 1 October 2020 to grant the First Defendant parole is discharged. (3) The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Whether reviewable error of law — Jurisdictional error — whether the defendant's circumstances constituted 'manifest injustice' - whether the State Parole Authority sufficiently considered mandatory considerations ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Procedural Fairness — whether the Commissioner was afforded the opportunity to provide adequate submissions to the State Parole Authority Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2014 Cases Cited: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Attorney-General of NSW v NSW State Parole Authority [2006] NSWSC 865 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney-General NSW (P) Damien James George (D) Representation: Counsel: D Birch (Crown) C Goodhand (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate