NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ilic v R [2020] NSWCCA 300 Hearing dates: 12 October 2020 Date of orders: 20 November 2020 Decision date: 20 November 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Garling J at [47]; Wright J at [63] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Allow the appeal. 3. Quash the sentence imposed by Williams SC DCJ. 4. Remit the proceedings to the District Court for sentence on 4 December 2020. Catchwords: SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — offender sentenced for offences against laws of the State — where offender asked the sentencing court to take federal offences into account on a "Form 1" — whether State legislation permitted the sentencing court to take federal offences into account — whether "Form 1" provisions picked up and applied as federal law by s 68(1) or s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) — whether Form 1 provisions inconsistent with federal sentencing law Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 15, Pt 3 Div 3, ss 53A, 103(2), Sch 2 Pt 14 cl 54 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Forms) Regulation 2004 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 2000 (NSW), Sch 1 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Regulation 2017 (NSW), cl 4 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), Pt 1B, ss 16A(1), 16BA, 19AJ Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth), s 6(1) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 12(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 68(1), 69, 79 Radiocommunications Act 1992 (Cth), s 47(1) Cases Cited: Adams v Western Australia [2014] WASCA 191; (2014) 245 A Crim R 351 Attorney General's Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 559; [2001] HCA 1 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie (2017) 327 FLR 71; [2017] NSWCCA 301 DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 242 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 John Robertson and Co Ltd (in liq) v Ferguson Transformers Pty Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 65; [1973] HCA 21 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Mok v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2016) 257 CLR 402; [2016] HCA 13 Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174; [2004] HCA 8 Rizeq v Western Australia (2017) 262 CLR 1; [2017] HCA 23 Solomons v The District Court of NSW (2002) 211 CLR 119; [2002] HCA 47 Woods v R [2020] NSWCCA 219 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Branimir Ilic (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) B K Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate