NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Taylor v Clientel Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWCATAP 240 Hearing dates: Heard on the papers Date of orders: 18 November 2020 Decision date: 18 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing in respect of the question of costs of the appeal is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. (2) Clientel Developments Pty Ltd must pay Bianca Taylor 20% of her costs of the appeal, such costs if not agreed to be assessed on the basis set out in Division 3 of Part 7 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014. Catchwords: COSTS – Calderbank Offer – Apportionment of costs Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Jones v Bradley(No. 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 SMEC Testing Services Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWCA 323 Taylor v Clientel Development Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 136 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Costs Parties: Bianca Taylor (Appellant) Clientel Developments Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Seow (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate