NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Moore (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1640 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 18 November 2020 Decision date: 18 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Williams J Decision: The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis. The balance of the defendant's costs (being the difference between the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis and on the indemnity basis) is to be paid out of the estate of the late Yvonne Gwendoline Smith. The Court makes no order as to the plaintiff's costs, with the intention that the plaintiff will bear his own costs. Catchwords: COSTS – whether unsuccessful claimant for provision out of deceased estate should pay own costs and pay defendant executor's costs – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 59 and 99 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1 and 42.20 Cases Cited: Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Detheridge v Detheridge [2019] NSWSC 183 Haertsch v Whiteway (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 287 Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 Hinderry v Hinderry (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1577 Meres v Meres (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 523 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Smith v Moore [2020] NSWSC 1446 Category: Costs Parties: Kenneth David Smith (Plaintiff) Minerva Ruth Moore (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J E Armfield (Plaintiff) Mr S F Hughes (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate