NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: French v Bremner [2020] NSWCA 299 Hearing dates: 17 November 2020 Decision date: 19 November 2020 Before: Leeming JA; Emmett AJA. Decision: 1. Stand over the application to adduce additional evidence, in so far as it concerns evidence of the webinar dated 6 September 2020, to the hearing of the appeal. 2. Otherwise dismiss the notice of motion dated 30 October 2020. 3. Costs reserved. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – additional evidence on appeal – fresh and further evidence – requirement that evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence at trial – application in substance refused Legislation Cited: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) Supreme Court 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Bramco Electronics Pty Ltd v ATF Mining Electrics Pty Ltd (2013) 86 NSWLR 115; [2013] NSWCA 392 French v Bremner [2019] NSWSC 1033 Hassan v Sydney Local Health District [2020] NSWCA 195 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2010] NSWCA 64 Provident Capital Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) v Andrew Boyd French [2015] NSWSC 1827 Tjiong v Tjiong [2012] NSWCA 201 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Andrew Boyd French (Appellant) Christopher Bremner (First respondent) Gabrielle June Bakey (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: Appellant / Applicant in person A Harding SC (First respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate