NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wright v Apthorpe [2020] NSWCA 300 Hearing dates: 5 May 2020 Date of orders: 20 November 2020 Decision date: 20 November 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; McCallum JA at [4]; Simpson AJA at [5]. Decision: 1. Leave granted to appeal with respect to proposed ground 1. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. Leave to appeal otherwise refused. 4. The applicant to file an appropriate notice of appeal by 4 December 2020. 5. The applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — General rule that costs follow the event — Discretion – No presumption or default rule as to the basis of the award of costs STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – r 42.2 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – whether s 98(1) of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) confines the judicial discretion in awarding costs – whether a judge must take as a starting point that costs are to be assessed on the ordinary basis and justify any departure from that position Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 98 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 127(2)(b) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 69(2) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1867 (Qld) s 58 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) ss 75A Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) s 151Z Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 20.26, 20.32, 20.26. 42.1, 42.2, 42.18 Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170; [1981] HCA 39 Apthorpe v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited & Ors [2019] NSWDC 135 Australian Conservation Foundation v Forestry Commission (1988) 81 ALR 166 Brighten v Traino (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 203 Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Coombes v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 70 Evans v Braddock (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 518 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Knight v F.P. Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178; [1992] HCA 28 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 134; [1990] HCA 59 Mahenthirarasa v State Rail Authority of NSW (No 2) (2008) 72 NSWLR 73; [2008] NSWCA 201 Milne v Attorney General for the State of Tasmania (1956) 95 CLR; [1956] HCA 48 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513; [1986] HCA 17 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Re Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Sanderson v Blyth Theatre Co [1903] 2 KB 533 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 The Age Company Ltd v Liu [2013] NSWCA 26 Walsh v Walsh (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1281 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Wright (Applicant) Kenneth Apthorpe (First Respondent) H.T.E. (Aust) Pty Limited (Second Respondent) QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Deakin QC/M Nesbeth (Applicant) G R Petty SC (First Respondent) D A Lloyd (Second Respondent) S E McCarthy/R J Pietriche (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate