NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lee (a pseudonym) v Dhupar [2020] NSWDC 717 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18, 26 April; 3, 4, 27, 28 June; 1 July and 30 August 2019, 14 August and 17 November 2020 Date of orders: 19 November 2020 Decision date: 19 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $408,700; 2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered; 3. The exhibits may be returned; 4. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further or other orders are required. Catchwords: TORTS – professional negligence – gynaecological surgery for elective sterilisation – failed Filshie clip tubal ligation leading to unwanted pregnancy – rejection of defence of inherent risk pursuant to s 5I of the Civil Liability Act 2002 – rejection of defence of peer professional practice pursuant to s 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 – findings of negligence and causation of harm; DAMAGES – assessment of claimed heads of damage – whether plaintiff's claimed economic loss was incurred as a result of psychiatric illness due to conception, pregnancy and birth or whether economic loss was due to the plaintiff rearing or maintaining her child – construction of s 71(1)(b) of the Civil Liability Act 2002 Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5B, s 5C, s 5D, s 5E, s 5I, s 5O, s 12(1), s 17A, s 27, s 70, s 71, Pt 11 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 7 and s 8(1)(a), (c), (e) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 60, s 136, s 140(1) UCPR r 31.27(1)(c), Sch 7, cl 3(e), r 31.20(2)(j) Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak; Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Bou Najem (2009) 238 CLR 420; [2009] HCA 48 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v FCT [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Amaca Pty Ltd v Ellis [2010] HCA 5 Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) FCR 1490; [1998] FAC 823 Angel v Hawkesbury Council [2008] NSWCA 130 Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury Shire Council (2001) CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 215 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 38 CGU Insurance Ltd v Porthouse (2008) 235 CLR 103, [2008] HCA 30 Clyne v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 150 CLR 1, [1981] HCA 40 Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2008] NSWCA 320 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Daw v Toyworld (NSW) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 25 Dobler v Halvorsen (2007) 70 NSWLR 151; [2007] NSWCA 335 Elayoubi v Zipser [2008] NSWCA 335 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Seven Cable Television Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1159 Goode v Angland [2017] NSWCA 311 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Ltd v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187 Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340; [1961] HCA 48 HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414; [1999] HCA 2 Inside Vacations Pty Ltd v Young (2010) 78 NSWLR 641; [2010] NSWCA 137 Kocis v SE Dickens Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 408 Leotta v Public Transport Commission of NSW (1976) 50 ALJR 666 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 March v Stramare (E & MH) Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 50; [1991] HCA 12 Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227 McGraw-Hinds (Aust) Pty Ltd v Smith (1979) 144 CLR 633; [1979] HCA 19 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1; [1995] HCA 5 Mt Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383; [1970] HCA 60 Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269; [1999] HCA 22 Neal v Ambulance Service of NSW [2008] NSWCA 346 Neville v Lam (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 607 Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58 Paul v Cooke (2013) 85 NSWLR 167, [2013] NSWCA 311 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Perisher Blue Pty Ltd v Nair-Smith (2015) NSWLR 1, [2015] NSWCA 90 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) v Dederer [2007] HCA 42; (2007) 234 CLR 330 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479; [1992] HCA 58 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434; [2001] HCA 18 Schultz v McCormack [2015] NSWCA 330 Sibley v Kais (1967) 118 CLR 424, [1967] HCA 43 South Western Sydney Local Health District v Gould [2018] NSWCA 69 Sparks v Hobson; Gray v Hobson [2018] NSWCA 29 SRA v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [1999] HCA 3 State of NSW v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133, (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15 Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2012) 246 CLR 182; [2012] HCA 5 Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537; [2010] HCA 12 The Nominal Defendant v Buck Cooper [2017] NSWCA 280 Teubner v Humble (1963) 108 CLR 491; [1963] HCA 11 Twynam Agricultural Group Pty Ltd v Williams [2012] NSWCA 326 Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Miller; Miller v Lithgow City Council [2015] NSWCA 320 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 442; [2005] HCA 62 Varga v Galea [2011] NSWCA 76 Wallace v Kam (2013) 250 CLR 375; [2013] HCA 19 Walter v James [2015] NSWCA 232 Warren v Gittoes [2009] NSWCA 24 Waverley Council v Ferreira [2005] NSWCA 418 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40; [1980] HCA 12 Yarrabee Coal Company Pty Ltd & Anor v Lujans [2009] NSWCA 85 Texts Cited: Leeming M, The Statutory Foundations of Negligence (2019, The Federation Press) Penfield AJ, "The Filshie clip for female sterilization : a review of world experience", AMJ Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183(3): 485-489 Peterson HB et al, "The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilisation : Findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization" (April 1996), American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp 1161-1170 Varma R, Gupta JK "Failed Sterilization: Evidence-based review and medico-legal ramifications" (December 2004) British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol 111, pp 1322-1332 Varma, R & Anor, "Precluding negligence in female sterilization failure : analysis of 131 cases"; Human Reproduction; 22(a); 2437-2443 Hansard, Second Reading Speech, Parliamentary Debates, New South Wales Legislative Assembly, 13 November 2003 Hansard, Second Reading Speech, Parliamentary Debates, New South Wales Legislative Assembly, 4 December 2003 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jodie Lee (a pseudonym) (Plaintiff) Nita Dhupar (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R O'Keefe (Plaintiff) Mr Cummings (Solicitor - 14 August 2020) (Plaintiff) Ms E Elbourne (16, 17, 18, 26 April 2019) (Defendant) Mr S Kalfas SC with Ms E Elbourne (from 3 June 2019) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate