NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hadler v R [2020] NSWCCA 305 Hearing dates: 16 November 2020 Decision date: 25 November 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [34]; Fagan J at [35] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – three counts of supply a prohibited drug, two of which involved a large commercial quantity – discount allowed for plea of guilty – discount erroneously applied to aggregate sentence rather than indicative sentences – need to re-sentence – despite error, a less severe sentence is not warranted in law – appeal dismissed. Cases Cited: Berryman v R [2017] NSWCCA 297 Cullen v R [2014] NSWCCA 162 Elsaj v R [2017] NSWCCA 124 Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 92 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 Parris v R [2013] NSWCCA 5 PG v R (2017) 268 A Crim R 61; [2017] NSWCCA 179 Regina v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 Weiss v R [2020] NSWCCA 188 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wayne Hadler – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: L Brasch/ M Voleynik – Applicant G Newton – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate