NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Glenn (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 308 Hearing dates: 2 September 2020 Date of orders: 25 November 2020 Decision date: 25 November 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] N Adams J at [7] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, leave is granted. (2) The appeal is allowed. (3) A new trial is ordered. (4) The matter is listed for arraignment in the District Court in Parramatta on 4 December 2020 at 9:30am. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – aggravated break and enter of a dwelling house and commit serious indictable offence – sexual intercourse without consent – pre-trial ruling – additional context evidence – reasons for lack of complainant – cross-examination of applicant – prosecutorial conduct – post-offence conduct – consciousness of guilt direction Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61I, s 112(2) Criminal Appeal Act, s 6(3) Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 130A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 41, s 137 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 27 Causevic v R [2008] NSWCCA 238 Curran v R [2020] NSWCCA 171 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193; [1993] HCA 63 Germakian v R (2007) 70 NSWLR 467; [2007] NSWCCA 373 Gonzales v R (2007) 178 A Crim R 232; [2007] NSWCCA 321 House v The King ((1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R (2015) NSWLR 474; [2015] NSWCCA 330 KNP v R [2006] NSWCCA 213 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 Livermore v R (2006) 67 NSWLR 659; [2006] NSWCCA 334 Patterson v R (Cth) [2001] NSWCCA 316 Pell v The Queen [2020] HCA 12 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Liristis [2004] NSWCCA 287 R v Obeid (No. 4) [2015] NSWSC 1442 R v Rugari [2001] NSWCCA 64; (2001) 122 A Crim R 1 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 Roulston [1976] 2 NZLR 644 Vickers v R [2006] NSWCCA 60 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Texts Cited: Judicial Commission of NSW, Equality Before the Law Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glen Barry (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Carroll with P Swaine (Applicant) Mr G Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate