NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rheem Australia Pty Ltd v McInnes (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1665 Hearing dates: 26 October, 5 November 2020 Date of orders: 6, 23 November 2020 Decision date: 23 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [83]-[84] Catchwords: EQUITY – tracing – mixed funds used to acquire property – equitable charge – charge includes interest on traceable amount COSTS – party/party – Calderbank offer – whether rejection unreasonable – plaintiff against separately represented defendants – form of costs order Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 37A, 66G Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: ATCO Controls Pty Ltd v Stewart [2013] VSCA 132 Challenger Managed Investment Ltd v Direct Money Corporation Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1072 Dimos v Willetts (2000) 2 VR 170 Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 Gray v Haig (1885) 20 Beav 219; 52 ER 587 Heperu Pty Ltd v Belle (2009) 76 NSWLR 230 Newton v The Grand Junction Railway Company (1864) 16 M & W 139; 153 ER 1133 Nguyen v Corbett (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 441 Scott v Scott (1963) 109 CLR 649 Re Diplock [1948] Ch 465 Category: Costs Parties: Rheem Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Paul Bruce McInnes (First Defendant) Nicole Maree McInnes (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Robertson (Plaintiff) GES Ng (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate