NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ludwig v Jeffrey (No. 2) [2020] NSWSC 1677 Hearing dates: Determined on the papers. Date of orders: 30 November 2020 Decision date: 30 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Directions given for the parties to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to the Court's reasons. Catchwords: EQUITY – Trusts and trustees – indemnity of trustee – the plaintiffs and the defendant were registered proprietors as joint tenants of certain real property – the defendant held his one third interest as joint tenant in the property on trust for the plaintiffs – the property sold and the net proceeds held pending the outcome of these proceedings – pursuant to orders of the Court part of the proceeds were applied by the plaintiffs to acquire another property – the defendant incurs expenses and tax liabilities as the trustee of his legal interest in the property – the plaintiffs accept liability to indemnify the defendant as trustee – what is the quantum of that indemnity in relation to the defendant's expenses and in relation to the defendant's potential liability to capital gains tax – whether the defendant's expenses were reasonably and properly incurred – how should the defendant's indemnity be secured – in what priority should the proceeds of sale be applied to satisfy the defendant's indemnity. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919, s 66G Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 Trustee Act 1925, s 59(4) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.25 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 17) (2011) 286 ALR 346 Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Limited (2001) 69 NSWLR 558 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Buckle (1998) 192 CLR 226 Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd v Kritharas Holdings (In Liq) [2002] NSWCA 29 Ludwig v Jeffrey [2019] NSWSC 1550 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church Saint Peka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar (2008) 237 CLR 66 National Trustees Executors & Agency Company of Australasia v Barnes (1941) 64 CLR 268 Nolan v Collie (2003) 7 VR 287 Northey v Juul [2014] NSWSC 464 Perpetual Nominees Limited v Storehouse Managed Investments Limited [2015] NSWSC 1994 Re Beddoe [1893] 1 Ch 547 Segal v Osborne (No. 20) [2016] NSWSC 1328 Vacuum Oil Co Pty Ltd v Wiltshire (1945) 72 CLR 319 Worrall v Harford (1802) 32 ER 250 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff/respondent: Joanne Elizabeth Ludwig Second Plaintiff/respondent: Robert Walter Ludwig Defendant/applicant: Lynton Barrett Jeffrey Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs/respondents: J. R. B. Pearson Defendant/applicant: C.T. Ensor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate