NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Matthew McMurray v The Transport Secretary on behalf of the State Transit Authority [2020] NSWIRComm 1080 Hearing dates: 20 - 21 October 2020 Date of orders: 25 November 2020 Decision date: 25 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Webster Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: PUBLIC SECTOR DISCIPLINARY APPEAL - Bus Operator - dismissal – safety of customers - recent final warning - facts of misconduct admitted – dismissal appropriate - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) Transport Administration (Staff) Regulation 2012 Cases Cited: Dewi El Khoury and State Transit Authority Division of the New South Wales Government Service [2012] NSWTAB 28 Maritime Services Board v Murray (1993) 52 IR 455 Marroun v State Transit Authority (2017) 96 NSWLR 295 Secretary, Department of Justice v Schoeman (2014) 86 NSWLR 749 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew McMurray (the appellant)
The Transport Secretary on behalf of the State Transit Authority (the respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Baroni for the respondent
Solicitors: Mr J Kennedy of Hall Payne Lawyers for the appellant Ms J Willingham of the respondent File Number(s): 2020/115265 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. Before the Commission is an appeal by Mr Matthew McMurray (the appellant) pursuant to s 98 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (the Act) from a decision of the Secretary of the Department of Transport as head of the Transport Service (State Transit Authority) (the respondent) to terminate his employment as a Bus Operator Level 2 on 3 April 2020. At the time of the termination of his employment, the appellant was about 48 years old and had been employed by the respondent for about six and a half (6.5) years. 2. The appellant was terminated from his employment after it was discovered that he had held a radio to his ear for 22 seconds while driving a bus in-service, with passengers on board, at approximately 1:40 am on 4 March 2020 (the incident). The conduct is admitted. 3. It is also admitted that the appellant's actions in picking up the radio constituted a breach of the Transport Code of Conduct and in particular, the following provisions: 1. Section 3 – Staff responsibilities; and 2. Section 9 – Workplace Health and Safety. 1. When the incident occurred, the appellant was on a final warning. The final warning was issued exactly four (4) months before the incident, after the appellant was issued with a penalty notice for travelling more than 20 kilometres an hour over the speed limit in one of the respondent's buses. Prior to this, the appellant had also received a warning by way of letter dated 8 June 2018 in respect of three (3) "collisions/incidents" since his last performance review and retraining, including "two (1) Responsible or Contributory Negligence collisions/incidents or passenger injuries." 2. I have decided for the reasons contained in this decision that the termination of the appellant's employment was appropriate in all of the circumstances.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate