NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v BOC Limited [2020] NSWCA 306 Hearing dates: 16 October 2020 Decision date: 26 November 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [64]; Leeming JA at [65] Decision: (1) Dismiss the summons filed on 25 June 2020. (2) Order the applicant to pay the first respondent's costs. Catchwords: CRIME – work health and safety – application for judicial review of verdict of acquittal – risk of death or serious injury to other persons – conduct of employee in the course of his duties – prosecution of employer – employer acquitted due to dishonesty of employee – attempt by prosecutor to review acquittal – Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), s 19(2) JUDICIAL REVIEW – supervisory jurisdiction – acquittal – principle of double jeopardy – application for judicial review in supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by prosecutor following acquittal – circumstances in which the Court's jurisdiction to review an acquittal is engaged JUDICIAL REVIEW – supervisory jurisdiction – discretion to refuse relief – opportunity to address trial judge or to seek stated case to the Court of Criminal Appeal prior to final orders – failure to apply to judge – subsequent attempt to invoke supervisory jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Coal Mines Act 1911 (UK), s 74 Commonwealth Constitution, s 73 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 100, 101, 107; Pt 8, Div 3 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Amendment (Double Jeopardy) Act 2006 (NSW), Sch 2.2[1] Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5A, 5AE District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 8 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24 Highway Act, 1835 (UK), s 72 Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), s 197A Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), ss 19, 30, 32, 229B, 230; Sch 2, cl 1 Cases Cited: Bros Bins Systems Pty Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales (2008) 74 NSWLR 257; [2008] NSWCA 292 Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338; [2016] NSWCCA 37 CI&D Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Registrar Industrial Court (NSW) (1996) 40 NSWLR 1 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Davern v Messel (1984) 155 CLR 21; [1984] HCA 34 Director of Public Prosecutions v Ozakca (2006) 68 NSWLR 325; [2006] NSWSC 1425 Ex parte Schofield; Re Austin; Ex parte Green; Re Austin (1953] 53 SR(NSW) 163 Hanna v O'Shane [2003] NSWSC 1055; 144 A Crim R 21 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123; [2018] HCA 34 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Orr v Cobar Management Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCCA 220 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 Quach v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 187 R v Bournemouth Crown Court, ex parte Weight [1984] 1 WLR 980 R v Simpson [1914] 1 KB 66 R v Tchorzewski (1897) 8 QLJ 79 Reg v Dorking Justices; ex parte Harrington [1983] QB 1076 Reg v Duncan (1881) 7 QBD 198 Reg v Middlesex Quarter Sessions (Chairman); Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1952] 2 Q.B. 758 SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 232 CLR 189; [2007] HCA 35 The Queen v The Keepers of the Peace and Justices of the County of London ("London Justices") (1890) 25 QBD 357 Thompson v Mastertouch TV Service Pty Ltd [No 3] (1978) 38 FLR 397 Texts Cited: M Aronson, M Groves and G Weeks, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed, LawBook Co, 2017) at [10.30] Second reading speech, Work Health and Safety Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, Parliamentary Debates, NSW Legislative Council Category: Principal judgment Parties: SafeWork NSW (Applicant) BOC Limited (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Agius SC / M Moir (Applicant) B D Hodgkinson SC / Y Shariff (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate