NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Plaintiff A and B v Bird; Plaintiff C v Bird; Plaintiff D v Bird [2020] NSWSC 1680 Hearing dates: On the Papers Decision date: 25 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: The parties should file final orders reflecting these conclusions and dealing with the other outstanding matters referred to in the submissions, within 7 days. Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – r 42.14 UCPR – where plaintiffs' offer of compromise not accepted and plaintiffs obtain judgment no less favourable – where plaintiffs made significant changes to their case after the offer of compromise was made – where offer of compromise was made one business day before hearing in a complex matter – application for indemnity costs refused COSTS – plaintiffs sought costs order in respect of expert reports not relied upon at trial – order refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss. 98(1)(b), 99 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr. 20.26(4), 42.1, 42.4, 42.14 Cases Cited: Gray v Hobson (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 131 Ko v CKAS Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 209 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85 Leda v Weerden (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 220 Maitland Hospital v Fisher [No 2] (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 Plaintiff A & B v Bird [2016] NSWSC 997 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (NSW Branch) (No 2) (2014) 88 NSWLR 471; [2014] NSWIC 3 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v King [2006] NSWCA 2 Plaintiff A and B v Bird; Plaintiff C v Bird; Plaintiff D v Bird [2020] NSWSC 1379 Category: Costs Parties: A (1st Plaintiff) B (2nd Plaintiff) C (3rd Plaintiff) D (4th Plaintiff) Rodney Raymond Bird (1st Defendant) Lisa Maree Clancy (2nd Defendant) Little Pigeon t/as Footprints Childcare Centre (3rd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Barry QC with M Tanevski and M Hamdan (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Plaintiffs) C Heazlewood (1st Defendant) A Horvath with R McEwen (2nd and 3rd Defendants) Solicitors: Shine Lawyers (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Plaintiffs) EMP Michael (1st Defendant) Norton Rose Fulbright (2nd and 3rd Defendants) File Number(s): 2013/375445; 2013/375437; 2020/65223
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate