NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tran v R (Cth) [2020] NSWCCA 310 Hearing dates: 16 November 2020 Decision date: 27 November 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [50]; Fagan J at [51] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – offence of dealing with money intended as a instrument of crime where value of money was more than $100,000 – maximum sentence of 20 years imprisonment – applicant played an integral role in transferring money in and out of Australia – applicant in charge and giving directions to a number of locally based participants – person Nguyen part of syndicate controlled by applicant – Nguyen physically attended banks and carried out transactions on behalf of applicant – when sentenced Nguyen received a much less sentence than the applicant – whether the applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance due to the disparity between her sentence and that of Nguyen – appeal against sentence dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Burrows v R [2017] NSWCCA 45 Why v R [2017] NSWCCA 101 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thi Quynh Quyen Tran – Applicant Regina (Cth) – Respondent Representation: Counsel: Q Nguyen (solicitor) – Applicant A Williams/K Fitzgerald – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate