NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sarant v Sarant [2020] NSWSC 1686 Hearing dates: 20 – 21 October 2020 Date of orders: 26 November 2020 Decision date: 26 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: The Court: 1. Stands the matter over until 9:00 a.m. on 15 December 2020 to enable the parties to reach agreement on the form of orders, including the order for costs. 2. Directs, if agreement cannot be reached within 7 days of the delivery of reasons, that each party deliver to the Court, within 10 days thereafter, written submissions, in hard and soft copy, comprising no more than 5 pages in length, setting out the orders sought and the basis for the making of that order. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family provision order sought by Plaintiff widower of the deceased – Marriage of 48 years, although separation under one roof, 4 years before the deceased's death – Estate comprising one half interest as tenants in common in matrimonial home of the deceased and Plaintiff, in which Plaintiff and deceased had lived for about 38 years – No provision for husband in the Will of the deceased – Provision only made for two adult children of the marriage – Antipathy between the children and the Plaintiff – Reasonable estate in value – Financial resources of the Plaintiff considered – Whether Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance and advancement in life – Obligation of the deceased towards surviving spouse – Nature of provision to be made – Whether absolute interest, life estate, Crisp order, or other form of provision should be made – Competing claim of each of the adult children of the deceased and the Plaintiff – Provision to be made for Plaintiff by way of absolute interest subject to conditions – Alternative relief if conditions not met – Costs of proceedings significant – Unable to determine costs as offers said to have been made that may be relevant Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 66F, 66G Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW), rr 23, 42 Practice Note SC Eq 7, par 6(b) Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 86 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 97 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 3, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 72, 84, 99 Testator's Family Maintenance and Guardianship of Infants Act 1916 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson (2010) 6 ASTLR 432; [2010] NSWCA 176 Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656; [2012] NSWCA 308 Aroney v Aroney (Supreme Court (NSW), McLelland J, 26 July 1988, unrep) Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571; [1918-19] All ER 860 Bartlett v Coomber [2008] NSWCA 100 Bkassini v Sarkis [2017] NSWSC 1487 Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Blendell v Blendell; Blendell v Blendell [2020] NSWCA 154 Boettcher v Driscoll (2014) 119 SASR 523; [2014] SASC 86 Borebor v Keane (2013) 11 ASTLR 96; [2013] VSC 35 Bowyer v Wood (2007) 99 SASR 190; [2007] SASC 327 Brown v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian (2012) 10 ASTLR 164; [2012] NSWCA 431 Burke v Burke (No 2) (2015) 13 ASTLR 313; [2015] NSWCA 195 Carey v Robson (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 1199 Chan v Chan (2016) 15 ASTLR 317; [2016] NSWCA 222 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Clune v Collins Angus & Robertson Publishers Pty Ltd (1992) 25 IPR 246; [1992] FCA 503 Cohen v Cohen (1929) 42 CLR 91; [1929] HCA 15 Court v Hunt (Supreme Court (NSW), Young J, 14 September 1987, unrep) Cowap v Cowap [2020] NSWCA 19 Crisp v Burns Philp Trustee Company Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), 18 December 1979, unrep) Darmanin v Cowan [2010] NSWSC 1118 Day v Couch [2000] NSWSC 230 de Angelis v de Angelis [2003] VSC 432 Devereaux-Warnes v Hall (No 3) (2007) 35 WAR 127; [2007] WASCA 235 Diver v Neal (2009) 2 ASTLR 89; [2009] NSWCA 54 Easterbrook v Young (1977) 136 CLR 308; [1977] HCA 16 Edgar v Public Trustee for the Northern Territory [2011] NTSC 5 Elliott v Elliott (Court of Appeal (NSW), 24 April 1986, unrep) Elliott v Elliott (Supreme Court (NSW), 18 May 1984, unrep) Estate of Joan Esme Little and the Succession Act 2006 [2015] NSWSC 1913 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Ferella v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2015) 13 ABC(NS) 452; [2015] NSWCA 411 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Forsyth v Sinclair (No 2) (2010) 28 VR 635; [2010] VSCA 195 Foundas v Arambatzis [2020] NSWCA 47 Gardiner v Gardiner (Supreme Court (NSW), 28 May 1998, unrep) Golosky v Golosky (Court of Appeal (NSW), Kirby P, 5 October 1993, unrep) Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490; [1980] HCA 31 Goodsell v Wellington [2011] NSWSC 1232 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Hampson v Hampson (2010) 5 ASTLR 116; [2010] NSWCA 359 Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 Harvey v Delaney [2003] NSWSC 589 Heyward v Fisher (Court of Appeal (NSW), Kirby P, 26 April 1985, unrep) Hoffmann v Hoffmann (1909) 29 NZLR 425 Hunter v Hunter (1987) 8 NSWLR 573 In the Marriage of Aleksovski (1996) 135 FLR 131; (1996) 20 Fam LR 894 In the Matter of the will of G.G. Sitch (deceased) [2005] VSC 308 Jones v Padavatton [1969] 1 WLR 328; [1968] EWCA Civ 4 Kalmar v Kalmar [2006] NSWSC 437 Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 Kembrey v Cuskelly [2008] NSWSC 262 Lado Causillas v NSW Trustee and Guardian; Bentancor Lado v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 1204 Langtry v Campbell (Supreme Court (NSW), Powell J, 7 March 1991, unrep) Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Liprini v Liprini [2008] NSWSC 423 Marinis v Jeweller [2000] NSWCA 282 Marshall v Carruthers; Marshall v Marshall [2002] NSWCA 47 McCosker v McCosker (1957) 97 CLR 566; [1957] HCA 82 McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 Milillo v Konnecke (2009) 2 ASTLR 235; [2009] NSWCA 109 Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618; [2006] UKHL 24 Moore v Moore (Court of Appeal (NSW), Hutley JA, 16 May 1984, unrep) Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513; [1986] HCA 17 O'Leary v O'Leary & Eccles [2010] NSWSC 1347 Palagiano v Mankarios [2011] NSWSC 61 Palmer v Dolman [2005] NSWCA 361 Papas v Co [2018] NSWSC 1404 Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Fraser (1995) 36 NSWLR 24 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544; [1915] HCA 14 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9; [1962] HCA 19 R (on the application of M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808; [2008] UKHL 52 R v Ulcay [2008] 1 WLR 1209; [2007] EWCA Crim 2379 Re Clissold (deceased) [1970] 2 NSWR 619 Re Hodgson; Beckett v Ramsdale (1886) 31 Ch D 177 Re Meier (deceased) [1976] 1 NZLR 257 Re Mercer (deceased) [1977] 1 NZLR 469 Re Schlink; Keane v Corns [2020] VSC 180 Re Stojanovska; Stojevski v Stojevski [2020] VSC 702 Richard v AXA Trustees Ltd [2000] VSC 341 Robertson v Pearce [2010] NSWSC 124 Sam Wardy v Gordon Salier; William Wardy v Gordon Salier; Hassiba Wardy v Estate of late Edmond Wadih Wardy, developer and Ch 3 of the Succession Act 2006 [2014] NSWSC 473 Sellers v Scrivenger [2010] VSC 320 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Shannon v Steinmetz [2019] HCASL 332 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201; [1994] HCA 40 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Smith v Johnson (2015) 14 ASTLR 175; [2015] NSWCA 297 South Australia v Commonwealth (1962) 108 CLR 130; [1962] HCA 10 Steinmetz v Shannon (2019) 99 NSWLR 687; [2019] NSWCA 114 Stern v Sekers; Sekers v Sekers [2010] NSWSC 59 Stott v Cook (1960) 33 ALJR 447 Sung v Malaxos [2015] NSWSC 186 The Auckland City Mission v Brown [2002] 2 NZLR 650; [2002] NZCA 33 Thomas v SMP (International) Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 822 Varma v Varma (2010) 6 ASTLR 152; [2010] NSWSC 786 Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Vukic v Luca Grbin; Estate of Zvonko Grbin [2006] NSWSC 41 Walker v Walker (Supreme Court (NSW), Young J, 17 May 1996, unrep) Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Webb v Ryan [2012] VSC 377 Weeks v Hrubala [2008] NSWSC 162 White v Barron (1980) 144 CLR 431; [1980] HCA 14 Worladge v Doddridge (1957) 97 CLR 1; [1957] HCA 45 Yee v Yee [2017] NSWCA 305 Texts Cited: Les Handler, Richard Neal and Michael Handler, Mason and Handler Succession Law and Practice NSW (2020, LexisNexis) Rosalind Atherton, "The Concept of Moral Duty in the Law of Family Provision – A Gloss or Critical Understanding?" (1999) 5(1) Australian Journal of Legal History 5 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Sarant (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate