NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Australian Managed Print Services (VIC) Pty Limited (in liq) [2020] NSWSC 1694 Hearing dates: 23 November 2020 Date of orders: 27 November 2020 Decision date: 27 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Gleeson J Decision: Leave is granted to the plaintiffs pursuant to s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to commence and proceed with the proposed further amended cross-claim against the Australian Managed Print Services (VIC) Pty Ltd (in liq) (the company) in District Court proceedings 2018/19194, substantially in the form of the pleading in Ex MK-2 to the affidavit of Michael Jonathan Kenny sworn 16 November 2020, except for the par [5] of the claims for relief and par [49] of the proposed cross-claim, on the condition that the plaintiffs do not seek to enforce any judgment against the company without further leave of the Court. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – practice and procedure –company in liquidation plaintiff in District Court proceedings – application for leave to commence and proceed with further amended cross-claim – claims for relief under Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) and for mistake at common law and in equity – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 471B COURTS AND JUDGES – where limited jurisdiction to determine equitable claims –claim for rescission of agreement based on mistake in equity – issue of construction – District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 134(1)(d) – no jurisdiction to determine equitable claim for rescission – leave to commence and proceed with cross-claim granted, except in relation to equitable claim for rescission Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, ss 237, 241, Sch 2 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 471, 471B District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 134(1)(d) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), Pt 3 Cases Cited: Alexander v Ajax Insurance Co Ltd [1956] VLR 436 Attard v James Legal Pty Ltd (2010) 80 ACSR 585; [2010] NSWCA 311 Australian Financial Services Leasing Pty Ltd v Hills Industries Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 560; [2014] HCA 14 Capita Financial Group Ltd v Rothwells Ltd (1989) 15 ACLR 348 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Kedwell [2019] NSWDC 610 Elegant Australia Pty Ltd v Chen [2020] NSWDC JF Keir Pty Ltd v Priority Management Systems Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2007] NSWSC 748 Kelly v Mina [2014] NSWCA 9 McDonough v Owners Strata Plan No 57504 [2014] NSWSC 1708; 17 BPR [98682] Ogilvie-Grant v East (1983) 7 ACLR Re AJ Benjamin Ltd (1969) 2 NSWLR 374 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 516; [2001] HCA 68 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422; [1983] HCA 5 Vagrand Pty Ltd (in liq) v Fielding (1993) 10 ACSR 373 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kay & Burton Pty Ltd (First plaintiff) Michael David Gibson (Second plaintiff) Kay & Burton (Flinders) Pty Ltd (Third plaintiff) Kay & Burton (Brighton) Pty Ltd (Fourth plaintiff) Kay & Burton (Hawthorn) Pty Ltd (Fifth plaintiff) Australian Managed Print Services (VIC) Pty Limited c/- its liquidator Mr Mark Damian Charles Roufeil of PKF Australia (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Herskope (Plaintiffs) No appearance (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate