NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jaghbir (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1704 Hearing dates: 5 November 2020 Date of orders: 2 December 2020 Decision date: 02 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: For the offence of procuring, aiding and counselling unknown persons to murder Kemel Barakat, Ahmed Jaghbir is sentenced to a non-parole period of six years and six months commencing 10 October 2020 and expiring 9 April 2027 with a balance of term of four years expiring 9 October 2031 Catchwords: CRIME - sentence - accessory before the fact to murder - where offender asked by deceased to replace front door and lock to deceased's apartment - where offender assisted assailants in the procuring of a key to the deceased's apartment - where offender knew that the deceased was to be shot in the deceased's apartment - where opportunity arose fortuitously and did not involve extensive planning -where offender took advantage of the trust the deceased had in him to replace the door - where offender had no prior criminal history - where offender convicted of offences subsequent to the index offence - expert evidence of offender's low intelligence - where offender continued to deny involvement in the offending - lack of remorse - low risk of reoffending - where finding of special circumstances because offender in protection in custody - where standard non-parole period for murder does not apply to charge of accessory before the fact SENTENCING – non-parole period – standard non-parole period – whether applicable for accessory before the fact to murder SENTENCING – accessory before the fact to murder - victim impact statement – whether deceased died as a direct result of the offence – whether should be taken into account in determination of the punishment for the offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 18, 93T, 346 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss21A, 28, 54, 61 Cases Cited: Aoun v R [2007] NSWCCA 292 Karl Suleman v R [2009] NSWCCA 70 Lu v R [2014] NSWCCA 307 R v AC (No 7) [2016] NSWSC 404 R v Jaghbir (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1383 R v Kirchner [2011] NSWSC 1516 R v Nathan John Blundell [2016] NSWSC 1810 R v Proud [2017] NSWSC 286 R v Robert Nikolovski [2018] NSWSC 1147 R v Zanker (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1254 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Ahmed Jaghbir (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Taylor (Crown) G James QC & E James (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate