NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ugur v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 293 Hearing dates: 26 October 2020 Date of orders: 2 December 2020 Decision date: 02 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION – government information – whether further information held by the agency Public interest considerations against disclosure – informants – personal information Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Beesley v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 52 Cianfrano v Director General, Department of Commerce and Anor (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 195 Miskelly v Secretary Department of Education [2019] NSWCATAD 48 NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing v Fahey [2012] NSWADTAP 55 Shepherd and Department of Housing, Local Government and Planning [1994] QICmr 7; (1994) 1 QAR 464 Wojciechowska v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 173 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haci Orhan Ugur (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Also heard Information Commissioner (see s 104(1), Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00166818 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(b) and (d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of, or disclosure to the applicant of the paragraphs of these reasons marked "Not for publication" is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate