State of New South Wales v Paton [2020] NSWSC 1707

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Paton [2020] NSWSC 1707 Hearing dates: 11 November 2020 Date of orders: 11 November 2020 Decision date: 02 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: See orders at [58] Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – Extended supervision orders – Conditions - serious sex offender – where parties have agreed that an ESO should be made – where a condition concerning search and seizure powers is in dispute – whether departmental officers should be required to inform the defendant of the basis of their 'reasonable suspicion' Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Baldwin v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWCA 112 New South Wales v Ley Thomas Baker (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 483 State of New South Wales v Ali [2010] NSWSC 1045 State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 State of New South Wales v Burns [2014] NSWSC 1014 State of New South Wales v Grooms (Final) [2019] NSWSC 353 State of New South Wales v Paton (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1178 State of New South Wales v Steven Single [2019] NSWSC 176 Wilde v the State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28; (2015) 249 A Crim R 65 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (P) Craig Hunter Paton (D) Representation: Counsel: Mr L A Fernandez (P) Ms E Sullivan (D)