NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: James Adam Pty Ltd v Fobeza Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 311 Hearing dates: 4 November 2020 Decision date: 03 December 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [3]; Leeming JA at [4]. Decision: Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - construction - mistake - whether mistake can be corrected by construction - contract for sale of proposed lot defined by reference to sketch plan - vendor obliged to procure subdivision in accordance with sketch plan - sketch plan showed area of 2001m2 - purchaser entitled to rescind if registered plan contained area of 2100m2 or more - whether literal meaning of language created absurdity or inconsistency - whether objective intention self-evident - consideration of relationship between construction and rectification - consideration of the term "rectification" Legislation Cited: Married Women's Property Act 1882 (UK) Surveying and Spatial Information Regulation 2017 (NSW), cl 66 Cases Cited: Bache v Proctor (1780) 1 Dougl 382; 99 ER 247 Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd (2001) 112 FCR 59; [2001] FCA 342 Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101; [2009] UKHL 38 East v Pantiles (Plant Hire) Ltd (1981) 263 EG 61 Energy World Corporation Ltd v Maurice Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 34; 239 ALR 457 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420; [1956] HCA 53 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd (2009) 76 NSWLR 603; [2009] NSWCA 407 Green Growth No 2 Ltd v Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust [2019] 1 NZLR 161; [2018] NZSC 75 Harker-Mortlock v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2019] NSWCA 56 HDI Global Specialty SE v Wonkana No. 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 Holding & Barnes Plc v Hill House Hammond Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1334; [2002] 2 P & CR 11 Hunt v Hunt (1862) 4 De GF & J 221; 45 ER 1168 ING Bank NV v Ros Roca SA [2011] EWCA Civ 353; [2012] 1 WLR 472 Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA (2014) 89 NSWLR 633; [2014] NSWCA 184 McHugh Holdings Pty Ltd v Newtown Colonial Hotel Pty Ltd (2008) 73 NSWLR 53; [2008] NSWSC 542 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd [2011] NSWCA 297 National Australia Bank Ltd v Clowes [2013] NSWCA 179 Newey v Westpac Banking Corporation [2014] NSWCA 319 Perpetual Ltd v Myer Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 98 Saxby Soft Drinks Pty Ltd v George Saxby Beverages Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1486; 14 BPR 27,213 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2019) 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 11 Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85; [2016] HCA 47 SZOXP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 1; [2015] FCAFC 69 Tatham v Huxtable (1950) 81 CLR 639; [1950] HCA 56 Wilson v Wilson (1845) 14 Sim 405; 60 ER 415 Wilson v Wilson (1854) 5 HL Cas 40; 10 ER 811 Texts Cited: J Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (University of London, The Athlone Press, 1970) J Carter, The Construction of Commercial Contracts (Hart Publishing, 2013) R Catterwell, A Unified Approach to Contract Interpretation (Hart Publishing, 2020) R Goff, "The Search for Principle" (1983) 69 Proceedings of the British Academy 169 J D Heydon, Heydon on Contract (Lawbook Co 2019) D Hodge, Rectification (2nd ed 2016, Sweet & Maxwell) D McLauchlan, "The lingering confusion and uncertainty in the law of contract interpretation" [2015] LMCLQ 406 F Pollock, Principles of Contract (Stevens & Sons, 7th ed, 1902) J Tarrant, Rectification of Documents (Federation Press, 2020) Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Adam Pty Ltd (Appellant) Fobeza Pty Ltd (First Respondent) William Kevin Young (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC, G Farland (Appellant) D Price (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate