NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chan v R [2020] NSWCCA 316 Hearing dates: 2 September 2020 Decision date: 15 December 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] N Adams J at [76] Decision: (1) Pseudonyms to be adopted in judgment. (2) Judgment is not to be published on NSW Caselaw before 1 December 2021, and not without consultation with both parties. (3) Leave to appeal granted. (4) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing for serious supply of large commercial quantities of "ice" – possession of pistol with ammunition – where application at first instance of discounts to aggregate sentence as opposed to indicative sentences made determination of appeal grounds impractical – error in application of discounts established – whether lesser aggregate sentence warranted in law – appeal against sentence dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 23, 33, 53A(2), 54B(4) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) s 25(2) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 26(1), 39(1), 65(3) Cases Cited: Brennan v R [2018] NSWCCA 22 Christou v R [2020] NSWCCA 193 Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 92 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Weir v R [2011] NSWCCA 123 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jenny Chan (Applicant) (a pseudonym) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Coroneos (Applicant) K Jeffreys (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate