NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brarny Partners Pty Ltd v Miller [2020] NSWCATAP 256 Hearing dates: 20 November 2020 Date of orders: 7 December 2020 Decision date: 07 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: G Curtin SC, Senior Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – false or misleading representations – defence that settlement agreement entered into preventing proceedings being brought on false or misleading representations – no evidence of settlement agreement at the hearing or on appeal ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – hearing rule – notice – allegation that not contacted by telephone for hearing – procedural unfairness – new hearing – appellant required to prove possibility of a successful outcome if new hearing ordered – no evidence of alleged defence – no possibility of a successful outcome if a new hearing ordered Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] 161 CLR 141 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brarny Partners Pty Ltd (Appellant) Jarrad Miller (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: A Awad (Director) (Appellant) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): AP 20/37684 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 13 August 2020 Before: P French, General Member File Number(s): MV 20/16743
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate