NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DVT v Commissioner of Police (No 4) [2020] NSWCATAD 299 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 8 December 2020 Decision date: 08 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Gracie, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to ss 60 (2) and (4) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings in the sum of $5000 within 28 days of the publication of these Reasons. 2. The proceedings are dismissed pursuant to s 55 (1) (a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Catchwords: COSTS - application withdrawn - special circumstances - no hearing on the merits - withdrawal effectively a surrender or capitulation - lump sum costs award - dismissal of application with costs Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ajami v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 95 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWSC 1391 Bostic Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 3014 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation – Strata Plan 73019 (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAD 224 Cripps v G & M Mawson [2006] NSWCA 84 D Constructions Pty Ltd v Walsh [2020] NSWCATAP 91 Hunter Development Corporation v Save Our Rail NSW Incorporated (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 375 Khanna v Bond Realty Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 128 Kiama Council v Grant [2006] NSWLEC 96 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; 170 CLR 334 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Nastav v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWCATAD 164 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 84 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; 193 CLR 72 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; 186 CLR 622 Rodny v Strike [2020] NSWCATAP 20 203 Castlereagh Street Pty Ltd v Skybloo Holdings Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 29 Zucker v Burbank Montague Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP Texts Cited: None Category: Costs Parties: DVT (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self-Represented) NSW Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00178009 Publication restriction: Order pursuant to s 64(1) (a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) prohibiting the publication or broadcast of the name of the applicant ('DVT').
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate