NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cappello & Anor v Scrivener & Anor [2020] NSWSC 1748 Hearing dates: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11 and 12 November 2020 Date of orders: 7 December 2020 Decision date: 07 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: First plaintiff entitled to declaration that there was a partnership with the first defendant and to equitable compensation for breach of that partnership Catchwords: CONTRACTS – oral agreement between first plaintiff and first defendant concerning proposed consolidation and possible development of three adjoining sites – where neither party made a note of the agreement – where neither party confirmed to the other in writing an understanding of the agreement – where no one else present when agreement made – where no dispute that a binding agreement was made concerning sharing expenses and profits of the venture – whether agreement was subject to the plaintiff finding buyer for the consolidated sites CONTRACTS – oral agreement between first plaintiff and first defendant concerning proposed consolidation and possible development of three adjoining sites – whether parties' post contractual conduct casts light on true nature of the agreement Cases Cited: Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd (2009) 76 NSWLR 603; [2009] NSWCA 407 Lym International Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011] NSWCA 303 Management Service Australia Pty Ltd v PM Works Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1743 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Texts Cited: P Herzfeld and T Prince, Interpretation (2nd ed, 2020, Thomson Reuters) Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Cappello (First Plaintiff) Shaka Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) John Sidney Scrivener (First Defendant) Tuscany Corporation Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D R Pritchard SC with D W Rayment (Plaintiffs) D B Studdy SC with L Chapman (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate