NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Segal v Sharma [2020] NSWCA 314 Hearing dates: 26 November 2020 Date of orders: 9 December 2020 Decision date: 09 December 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Payne JA at [46] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellants pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction and interpretation – where agreement as to "commercial arrangements" to apply to radiology practice conducted through corporate trustee of unit trust – where units held by doctors' discretionary trusts – whether doctors liable to pay shortfall in event business runs at loss – whether loss had to be based on audited financial accounts – no question of principle Cases Cited: Agricultural & Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Segal (First Appellant) Melita Segal (Second Appellant) Praneal Dutt Sharma (First Respondent) South West Radiology Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G P Gee (Appellants) C R C Newlinds SC with E T Finnane (First Respondent)
Solicitors: Keypoint Law (Appellants) Carneys Lawyers (First Respondent) Bridges Lawyers (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/148680 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: [2020] NSWDC 121 Date of Decision: 22 April 2020 Before: Russell SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/363590
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate