NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sundararajah v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWCATOD 144 Hearing dates: 25, 26 and 27 November 2020 Date of orders: 09 December 2020 Decision date: 09 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: The Hon F Marks, Principal Member Dr G Labour, Senior Member Dr K Campbell, Senior Member M Maher, General Member Decision: (1) The application is dismissed. (2) Costs are reserved with liberty to apply which should be exercised within one month of this date. Catchwords: TRADES AND PROFESSIONS – application for review of decision to cancel registration of dental practitioner-principles on review-held applicant continues to suffer from an impairment-application dismissed-costs reserved Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) ss 5,139,163A,163B,163C Cases Cited: HCCC v Sunda [2013] NSWDT 1 HCCC v Sundarajah [2017] NSWCATOD 182 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sundarajah (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 86 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 166 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raahulan Sundarajah (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Wright (Applicant) I Chatterjee (Respondent)
Solicitors: Navado Lawyers and Solicitors (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00194192 Publication restriction: Pursuant to section 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate