NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kerollos [2020] NSWSC 1758 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 08 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: R A Hulme J Decision: The trial of R v Kerollos is to proceed by way of judge alone. Catchwords: CRIME – murder – application for trial by judge alone – issues of mental illness and substantial impairment – credibility a neutral issue – mitigating coronavirus delays significant factor in interests of justice – application granted Legislation Cited: COVID-19 Legislation Amendment (Emergency Measures – Miscellaneous) Act 2020 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 132, 365 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: Fang v R (2018) 97 NSWLR 876; [2018] NSWCCA 210 R v Belghar (2012) 217 A Crim R 1; [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Flame [2020] NSWSC 1013 R v Gokhan Eyuboglu [2019] NSWSC 181 R v Hadler [2018] NSWSC 1151 R v Jaghbir (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 955 R v M'Naghten (1843) 8 ER 718 R v Mackie (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1654 R v McNeil (2015) 250 A Crim R 12; [2015] NSWSC 357 R v Porter (1933) 55 CLR 182 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) (2015) 249 A Crim R 120; [2015] NSWSC 259 Sodeman v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 192 Stapleton v The Queen (1952) 86 CLR 358 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mourad Kerollos (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms C Davenport SC (Applicant) Mr P Hogan (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate