NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 320 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 December 2020 Decision date: 10 December 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA; McCallum JA Decision: Dismiss Dr Zepinic's notice of motion filed on 22 July 2020, with costs. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – amending, varying and setting aside – motion under UCPR r 36.16 to set aside previous judgment of Court refusing leave to appeal – arguments advanced by applicant plainly groundless and either previously addressed by the Court or not advanced on the previous occasion when the opportunity to do so existed – public interest in the finality of litigation – no change in circumstances or other good reason to permit further leave application to be made Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.16 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Lawrence v Ciantar (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 186 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 72 Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Dr Vito Zepinic (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented Applicant Ms P Lowson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Self-represented Applicant Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/43054 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2020] NSWSC 13 Date of Decision: 03 February 2020 Before: N Adams J File Number(s): 2018/385664
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate