NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Orix Australia Corporation Limited [2020] NSWSC 1770 Hearing dates: 26 November 2020 Decision date: 09 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Striking out — Relevance of prior arrest and criminal charges — Form of language in pleading — Whether use of certain phrases embarrassing because paragraphs do not adequately disclose case to be met — Misleading or deceptive conduct claims based on communications between officers and auditors — Whether no reasonable cause of action because communications between officers and auditors not in trade or commerce Catchwords: Paragraphs 57, 73, 110(a)-(b), 172(a)-(c) and 194 of Statement of Claim struck out with leave to replead consistent with judgment. Strike out application unsuccessful on other paragraphs. Legislation Cited: - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, s 18 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 181, 182, 1317H - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.28, 15.10 Cases Cited: - Aardwolf Industries LLC v Tayeh [2020] NSWCA 301 - Archer v Channel Seven Perth Pty Ltd [2002] WASC 160 - Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group [2011] NSWSC 704 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Flugge [2016] VSC 779 - Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 - Cassegrain v Cassegrain (2015) 254 CLR 425; [2015] HCA 2 - Cleary v Australian Co-Operative Foods (No 2) (1999) 32 ACSR 701; [1999] NSWSC 1062 - Commonwealth Bank of Australia v ZYX Learning Centres Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1676 - Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594; [1990] HCA 17 - General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 - Iacullo v Iacullo [2013] NSWSC 1517 - New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd v Daya (2008) 66 ACSR 95; [2008] NSWSC 64 - NRMA Ltd v Yates (2000) 18 ACLC 45; [1999] NSWSC 859 - PakeFX Pty Ltd v Dickson [2014] NSWSC 1424 - Vanguard Financial Planners Pty Ltd v Ale (2018) 125 ACSR 1; [2018] NSWSC 314 - Yates v Whitlam (1999) 32 ACSR 595; [1999] NSWSC 976 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Orix Australia Corporation Limited (Plaintiff) John Joseph Carter (First Defendant) George Georgiou (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Bolster/A Zheng (Plaintiff/Respondent) M Ashhurst SC/D Mackay (First Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate