NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lopes v Cook [2020] NSWSC 1776 Hearing dates: 7 December 2020 Decision date: 09 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against conviction and sentence. (2) Dismiss the appeal. (3) Order the plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Property offences — Aggravated unlawful entry on inclosed lands — Defences — Necessity — Whether magistrate erred CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Manifest excess SENTENCING — Appeal against sentence — Co-offenders — Disparity between sentences — Where same penalty imposed on all offenders — Alleged disparity due to differing financial circumstances of offenders Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 52, 53, 55, 72 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 9, 10, 17 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 191 Fines Act 1996 (NSW), s 6 Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW), s 4B Public Order (Protection of Persons and Property) Act 1971 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 23 Cases Cited: B v R [2015] NSWCCA 103 Clarkson v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 70; (2007) 171 A Crim R 1 Cunningham v Cunningham (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 954 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Eakin v R [2020] NSWCCA 294 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Maritime Authority of New South Wales v Rofe (2012) 84 NSWLR 51; [2012] NSWSC 5 Mark v Henshaw (1998) 85 FCR 555 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mattar v R [2012] NSWCCA 98 Perka v The Queen (1984) 14 CCC (3d) 385 R v Loughnan [1981] VR 443 R v PL [2009] NSWCCA 256; (2009) 199 A Crim R 199 Re Appeal of White (1987) 9 NSWLR 427 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 RH v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 305; (2014) 244 A Crim R 221; Rogers v R (1996) 86 A Crim R 542 Sayer-Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1786 Taiapa v The Queen (2009) 240 CLR 95: [2009] HCA 53 Turner v Wheeler (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 431 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629; [2003] HCA 14 Zecevic v DPP (Vic) (1987) 162 CLR 645; [1987] HCA 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ana Lopes (First plaintiff) Peter Maresch (Second plaintiff) Charlize Reynierse (Third plaintiff) Catherine Smith (Fourth plaintiff) Maria Veira (Fifth plaintiff) Andrew Faulkner (Sixth plaintiff) Peter Cook (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Singleton (Plaintiffs) J Caldwell (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate