NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Beattie v R [2020] NSWCCA 334 Hearing dates: 26 November 2020 Date of orders: 26 November 2020 Decision date: 14 December 2020 Before: Johnson J at [1]; R A Hulme J at [101] Wilson J at [102] Decision: 1. Grant leave to the Applicant under Rule 4 Criminal Appeal Rules to rely upon Ground 2. 2. Allow the appeal against conviction at the Sydney District Court on 6 March 2020 for an offence under s.61I Crimes Act 1900. 3. Quash the conviction and order that there be a retrial. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against conviction – offences of having sexual intercourse without consent knowing that the complainant was not consenting – whether jury misdirected on effect of substantial intoxication concerning complainant's capacity to consent – whether jury misdirected concerning consent where issue raised whether complainant had mistaken belief as to identity of the person engaging in sexual intercourse with her - consideration of s.61HA Crimes Act 1900 - comparison with successor provision in s.61HE – Crown concession of error – error established – conviction quashed – retrial ordered Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Legislation Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse) Act 2018 Jury Act 1977 Cases Cited: Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 71 Bochkov v R [2009] NSWCCA 166 Gillard v The Queen (2014) 88 ALJR 606; [2014] HCA 16 Tabbah v R [2017] NSWCCA 55 Tonari v R (2013) 237 A Crim R 490; [2013] NSWCCA 232 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joshua Henry Beattie (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Smith (Applicant) Mr B Hatfield (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate