NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 324 Hearing dates: 5 March 2020 Date of orders: 11 December 2020 Decision date: 11 December 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; McCallum JA at [94]; Simpson AJA at [95] Decision: 1. Leave granted to appeal against the orders of 7 August 2019. 2. Appeal allowed in part. 3. Order 2 be set aside. 4. Appeal otherwise dismissed. 5. No order as to costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Parties — Vexatious litigants – Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – s 6 – meaning of "vexatious proceedings" – s 8(1) – meaning of "frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings" – assessment of frequency CIVIL PROCEDURE — Parties — Vexatious litigants – exercise of discretion – balance between access to the processes of the law and restraint of unwarranted exercise of that access CIVIL PROCEDURE — Hearings — Procedural fairness – expansion of orders as compared to those sought – making an order in terms not foreshadowed during or after the hearing – no opportunity for parties to be heard Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 61, 73 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 326, 327, 338 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 23 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 203 Federal Court of Australia Rules 1976 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 35A Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) ss 345, 498 Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, r 64 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), ss 62, 86; Sch 2, cll 1, 2, 4 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 40 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 84, 75A, 101 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 55 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.16 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 6, 8, 14-16 Cases Cited: Attorney General of New South Wales v Croker [2010] NSWSC 942 Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Be Financial Pty Ltd atf Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd (2011) 198 FCR 153; [2011] FCAFC 159 Glover v Australian Concrete Floors Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 503 Hambleton v Labaj [2010] QSC 124 Mahmoud v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 12 Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 141 Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 400 Mohareb v Palmer (No 3) [2016] NSWDC 38 Mohareb v Palmer (No 4) [2017] NSWDC 127 Mohareb v Palmer (Supreme Court (NSW), Fagan J, 2 September 2019, unrep) Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWCA 369 Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWDC 134 Mohareb v Palmer [2016] NSWCA 378 Mohareb v Palmer [2017] NSWCA 281 Mohareb v Palmer [2017] NSWSC 1491 Mohareb v Palmer [2018] HCASL 18 Mohareb v Palmer [2018] NSWCA 220 Moss v McIlveen [2011] NSWCA 77 Nader Mohareb; Matthew Palmer v Nader Mohareb NSD 1760 of 2017 National Australia Bank Ltd v Freeman [2006] QSC 86 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398 Palmer v Mohareb [2019] NSWSC 975 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 Potier v Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales (2015) 89 NSWLR 284; [2015] NSWCA 129 R De W Kennedy (Finance) Pty Ltd v Ley; Ley v Scarff (Supreme Court (NSW), Holland J, 29 March 1978, unrep) Robinson Helicopters Company Incorporated v McDermott [2016] HCA 22; (2016) 90 ALJR 679 Singh v The Owners Strata Plan 11723 [2013] NSWSC 1595 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 Soden v Kowalski [2011] FCA 318 Spencer v The Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 The Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Mohareb [2016] NSWSC 1823 Viavattene v Attorney-General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 White Industries Australia Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 160 FCR 298; [2007] FCA 511 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nader Mohareb (Applicant) Matthew Palmer (First Respondent) Attorney-General of NSW (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) J Emmett/R McEwen (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate