NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd v Fourtounas [2020] NSWCA 325 Hearing dates: 10 December 2020 Decision date: 10 December 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; White JA at [18] Decision: (1) Dismiss the summons seeking leave to appeal dated 27 August 2020. (2) Direct the applicant to pay the respondent's costs in this Court. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – failure to address defence – absence of factual findings supporting defence – whether issue of principle raised – whether defence more than merely arguable TORTS – duty to warn – immunity from liability if risk "obvious" – whether immunity limited to verbal risk warnings – application of Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5F, 5H Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5F, 5H Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), Pt 6 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd atf Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 184 Coffs Harbour City Council v Polglase [2020] NSWCA 265 Coulter v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 350; [1988] HCA 3. Council of the City of Sydney v Bishop [2019] NSWCA 157 Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29 Ratewave Pty Limited v BJ Illingby [2017] NSWCA 103 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sylvia Fourtounas (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D A Lloyd SC / Ms S Andrews (Applicant) Mr R Sheldon SC / Mr E P Anderson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate