NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Marshall v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 308 Hearing dates: 21 August 2020; 1 September 2020 Date of orders: 11 December 2020 Decision date: 11 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Firearms licence - refusal of licence - public interest Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Ors (1995) 131 ALR 657 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] VicRp 6; (1991) 1 VR 63 EJU v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 270 Ward v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2004] NSWADT 110 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Marshall (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Warwick McCarthy & Co, Solicitors (Applicant) Maddocks (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00094290 Publication restriction: The disclosure of the material filed by the Respondent on a confidential basis is prohibited. This order is made pursuant to section 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Those paragraphs of these reasons identified as [NOT FOR DISCLOSURE] are not to be released other than to the Respondent without further order of the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate