NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Landcorp Australia Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2020] NSWLEC 174 Hearing dates: 11 November 2020 Date of orders: 14 December 2020 Decision date: 14 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Duggan J Decision: See paragraphs 130 and 131 Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – appeal – development application – whether the development is prohibited development – the sign is a business identification sign – Part 3 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 does not apply – the development does not result in a projection higher than the sun access plane – the existing building height is in breach of the height control however the proposed development does not exceed the existing height – the development is not prohibited ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – appeal – development application – whether the development should be refused on merit – development satisfies criteria specified in schedule 1 to State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 – compatible with character of the area – heritage significance not diminished to sufficiently adverse extent – development improves quality and amenity of public domain – development displays design excellence – only one sign approved as per section 3.16.5.2(7) of the development control plan Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Interpretation Act 1987 State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 – Advertising and Signage Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Bunnings Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (2004) 134 LGERA 386 Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd (2019) 101 NSWLR 245 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Landcorp Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Galasso SC (Applicant) Ms J Reid (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate