NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Davis and Quinn (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1800 Hearing dates: 9 December 2020 Date of orders: 11 December 2020 Decision date: 14 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: That the jury be directed to enter a verdict of not guilty against Ms Quinn for count 1 on the indictment (murder). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder – joint criminal enterprise – self-defence – excessive self-defence – co-accused – directed verdict – whether there is no evidence upon which a jury could convict – listening device material – eyewitness accounts – accused's account in ERISP – competing inferences Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Reference (No 1 of 1983) [1983] 2 VR 410 Doney v R (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 JMR v R (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 R v Bilick and Starke (1984) 36 SASR 322; 11 A Crim R 452 Regina v PL [2012] NSWCCA 31 Regina v XHR [2012] NSWCCA 247 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Blake Davis (Accused) Hannah Quinn (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Taylor (Crown) Ms M Cunneen SC (Accused Davis) Mr T Hughes (Accused Quinn)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Bannisters Lawyers (Accused Davis) Korn MacDougall Legal (Accused Quinn) File Number(s): 2018/249752; 2018/248991
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate