State of New South Wales v Richardson (Final) [2020] NSWSC 1809

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Richardson (Final) [2020] NSWSC 1809 Hearing dates: 9 December 2020 Date of orders: 14 December 2020 Decision date: 14 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: 1 Pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) ("the Act"), the defendant shall be subject to an Extended Supervision Order ("the Extended Supervision Order") for a period of 5 years from 15 December 2020; 2 Pursuant to s 11 of the Act, the defendant is directed, for the period of the Extended Supervision Order, to comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to this Order; 3 An order that access to the Supreme Court's file in respect of any document shall not be granted to a non-party without the leave of a Judge of the Court, and, if any application for access is made by a non-party in respect of any document, the parties are to be notified by the Registrar so as to allow them an opportunity to be heard in relation to the application of access. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – Extended Supervision order – unacceptable risk – relevance of offender registration scheme – duration Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D, 5I Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW), Pt 3, Div 7A and 8, ss 3, 3A, 9, 14A, 16C, 17 Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v GJO (Final) [2020] NSWSC 1412 State of New South Wales v Stevenson (Final) [2019] NSWSC 778 State of NSW v Richardson (preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1442 Wilde v State of New South Wales (2015) 249 A Crim R 65; [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Mark William Richardson (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Climo (Plaintiff) P Coady (Defendant)